From Caution to Capitalization: How Private Credit and Debt Funds Are Shaping CRE in 2025
The commercial real estate (CRE) financing landscape has shifted dramatically. In 2025, traditional lenders – regional and global banks – have largely pulled back from CRE lending due to regulatory pressures (Basel III “endgame”) and tighter balance sheets (withintelligence.com) (brookfield.com). This retreat has left a multi-hundred-billion-dollar funding gap. For example, KKR notes that U.S. banks historically provided about 40% of CRE loans; even a modest pullback to 30% implies a funding shortfall on the order of $300+ billionkkr.com. With ≈$4.5 trillion in U.S. CRE debt maturing by 2028 (brookfield.com) and fixed-rate loan extensions expiring, owners urgently need new capital. Into this void have stepped private credit and real estate debt funds (Blackstone, Oaktree, KKR, Brookfield, etc.), which are aggressively raising capital and deploying across the capital stack.
Alternative lenders are processing far more CRE deal flow than before: Brookfield reports that between Oct 2023 and Oct 2024, the volume of CRE loans originated by non-bank lenders rose +34%, while traditional bank lending fell 24% (brookfield.com). KKR similarly highlights that its direct-lending pipeline jumped from about $14.5 billion per week in early 2024 to over $20 billion per week by late 2024 (kkr.com). In short, deal flow is rebounding but banks aren’t there to finance it. This has made 2024–25 an opportunistic vintage: well-capitalized debt funds are stepping in with credit at scale and structuring creativity.
Private CRE debt vehicles have been raising record funds to meet demand. For example, in March 2025 Blackstone closed its $8 billion Real Estate Debt Strategies V fund (BREDS V) – its largest-ever credit fund – joining a wave of mega-fund closes (blackstone.com) (reuters.com). BREDS V (with $77bn AUM already in its armory) emphasizes “flexible capital” deployed globally via senior loans, liquid securities, and tailored structured solutions (blackstone.com). Other private credit firms (KKR, Brookfield, Ares, Apollo, Oaktree) have similarly bulked up their real estate debt platforms, often merging or acquiring origination teams. Fundraising remains concentrated among top managers; LPs report putting “a premium on longevity,” preferring seasoned credit teams (withintelligence.com). Indeed, WithIntelligence notes that five “mega” direct-lending funds (>$10bn each) raised $89bn in 2024 – roughly two-thirds of all direct lending fundraising (withintelligence.com).
Institutional investors are backing this drive toward private CRE credit for several reasons. First, the search for yield: with public bond and REIT yields suppressed by rising rates, locked-up private loans can deliver attractive coupon income. As one global asset manager observes, seasoned private debt investors now target ~6–8% yields on senior CRE loans, seeking higher double-digit returns via mezzanine or preferred positions (cms.investmentofficer.com). (Brookfield likewise notes private CRE yields north of ~10% are attainable on high-yield structures) (brookfield.com). Second, diversification and downside protection: private debt is secured by real assets, contracts, or rental cash flows, and often includes covenants and amortization. Goldman Sachs calls the “structural protections” (covenants, first liens, etc.) built into private loans a key source of “credit alpha” – i.e. excess return from avoiding losses (am.gs.com). In practice, managers aim to minimize write-downs and maximize recoveries, capturing an illiquidity premium unavailable in public markets (am.gs.com). Third, capital availability vs. credit conditions: regulators and risk-averse debt funds have kept money within the system but only willing to lend via private vehicles. Banks even now often lend to debt funds (e.g. warehouse lines to mortgage REITs), but direct CRE lending is largely off their balance sheets (kkr.com). Global LPs – from Japanese pensions to European insurers – are increasing allocations to such yield-generating, credit-oriented strategies (withintelligence.com) (reinsurancene.ws).
Flexible Capital Structures
Private lenders are deploying a wide variety of financing structures to fit borrower needs. Whereas banks mostly offered straight first mortgages, private credit funds can and do use the full capital stack. Key structures include:
Senior Secured Loans: First-lien mortgages on stabilized assets (often floating-rate). These loans benefit from collateral protection and covenants. Private funds can offer speed and certainty of execution compared to CMBS or syndication. (Investors targeting this space still expect single-digit returns of 6–8% (cms.investmentofficer.com), but get secure collateral and floating-rate protection.)
Mezzanine Debt / Second Mortgages: Subordinate loans filling the gap between senior debt and equity. These carry higher coupons than senior debt, often with warrants or PIK (payment-in-kind) features. Funds like Brookfield and Blackstone have sizeable mezzanine strategies to bridge shortfalls for transactions or refinancings.
Preferred Equity: Hybrid equity/debt structures that behave like mezzanine; holders get equity-like upside caps or participation. Preferred equity can be used to recapitalize recapitalizing sponsors without diluting them fully. (Dwight Mortgage Trust, for example, launched a fund providing preferred equity and mezzanine to rescue stranded projects) (dwightcapital.com).
Rescue Capital: Special situations lending aimed at troubled refinancing. With roughly $2 trillion of loans maturing by 2026rejournals.com, many sponsors face a “refinance wall.” Funds are positioning as last-resort capital providers. Dwight’s new “rescue” fund targets assets (multifamily, mixed-use, office, retail) where sponsors lack enough equity to re-fund. Its focus: creative bridge loans or preferred injections to avert foreclosures (dwightcapital.com) (dwightcapital.com).
NAV Lending: An emerging niche where funds lend against the Net Asset Value of private real estate portfolios or fund interests. For example, closed-end RE funds or REITs with thin trading may secure loans on their NAV to bridge new acquisitions or pay distributions. LPs see NAV loans as a way to monetize illiquid fund interests. (This strategy was highlighted as a growing part of private debt, though specific CRE examples remain sparse.)
Overall, fund managers emphasize flexibility. Blackstone notes BREDS V is “deploying capital across several strategies, including global scale lending, liquid securities, structured solutions…”(blackstone.com). KKR similarly observes that since 2023 its real estate credit efforts range from straight senior loans to “structured solutions” and opportunistic credit – effectively treating CRE like a global credit market.
Global Dry Powder Flows into U.S. CRE Credit
One striking trend of 2025 is the internationalization of capital chasing U.S. CRE debt. With U.S. yields among the highest globally, foreign LPs – sovereign funds, family offices, insurers, and pension funds – are redeploying into American real estate credit.
Family Offices: Globally, wealthy families are increasing their CRE bets. A March 2025 survey (Knight Frank/CRE Daily) found that 44% of family offices plan to ramp up real estate investments, especially in residential and industrial sectors (credaily.com). Many see direct or debt deals in the U.S. as attractive diversifiers. (U.S. family offices, and those from Canada and the UK, were noted to be especially active.) In practice, this is showing up as co-investments or LP commitments to U.S.-focused debt funds. Qualitative reports suggest Gulf and other international family offices are now key allocators to large credit funds, trading liquidity for yield and reliability (privatedebtinvestor.com) (credaily.com).
European Insurers: Continental and British insurers have long favored fixed-income, but are gradually embracing private credit (including CRE debt). Moody’s reports that as of 2024, ~13% of European insurers’ portfolios were in private credit (broadly defined) (reinsurancene.ws). This is still below U.S. levels, but regulators in Europe (e.g. recent Solvency II reforms in the UK) are making credit more accessible. Large life insurers in the UK commonly allocate 15–25%+ to these strategies, and many continental firms are raising limits on direct lending and mortgage portfolios (reinsurancene.ws). In short, insurers (looking for long-duration, floating assets) are significant new sources of private CRE capital.
Middle Eastern Sovereign Wealth & Pension Funds: Gulf and Asian sovereigns are already huge real estate players, and they are pushing into private credit too. Research notes Middle Eastern SWFs will “continue to flex their muscles” in alternative credit (withintelligence.com), and anecdotally funds from the UAE, Qatar, and Saudi Arabia have been co-investing in U.S. debt deals alongside private funds. These institutional LPs bring patient capital and generally seek “credit alpha” – i.e. incremental return via structure rather than leverage. Their interest is partly strategic (long-term inflation hedge) and partly tactical (getting paid more to lend).
Asian Allocators: Japan’s massive Government Pension Investment Fund and other Asian investors (like Singapore’s GIC or Korean pension funds) are historically underweight foreign CRE but are now eyeing U.S. opportunities. CBRE data show Japanese capital re-entering U.S. offices: in late 2024 a Japanese developer acquired a Manhattan office for $500+ million (cbre.com). Similarly, Chinese insurers and Korean funds – facing domestic headwinds – have begun scaling back into global credit markets. While weaker local currencies can be a headwind, the breadth of LP commitments to global debt funds suggests that many Asian institutions plan to increase allocations to U.S. real estate debt for yield and diversification.
Indeed, CBRE’s capital flow report highlights a jump in cross-border U.S. inflows: half-year flows into North America in H2 2024 rose 40% to $9 billion (cbre.com), led by European investors, with Asian and Middle Eastern allocators following on. Prime gateway markets – New York, San Francisco, Boston – continue to attract this new credit capital. (For example, two consecutive Manhattan office trades by a Japanese buyer and a German insurer – each $500m+ – were completed in late 2024) (cbre.com). Moreover, foreign interest is heavily skewed toward sectors: industrial & logistics accounted for 47% of cross-border equity and debt flows (cbre.com), underscoring how international LPs see U.S. logistics as a global safe haven.
Trends by Asset Class
Private credit lenders have tailored strategies to each major sector:
Multifamily: Still the largest CRE property type in U.S. debt, multifamily has seen record deliveries: ~580,000 new apartments came online in 2024, the most since 1974 (rejournals.com). This glut of recently built, stabilized assets creates a refinancing opportunity. Many sponsors are facing maturing construction or bridge loans. Private debt can step in for balloon maturities or bridge until rents catch up. Yields in multifamily loans remain relatively modest (still sub-10% for core senior), but mezzanine and preferred plays can reach low double-digits. Funds are especially active in Sun Belt markets (Houston, Atlanta, Phoenix), where multifamily assets still have healthy occupancy but borrowers struggled to refinance after high construction costs.
Industrial/Logistics: Demand for warehouses, data centers and logistic parks remains robust. Vacancy rates have risen slightly but are still low by historical standards, and rising global trade flows support long-term rents. As banks pulled back from new land acquisitions, credit funds have begun financing the last mile of development – including raw land financing and forward-funding deals. Importantly, industrial debt is now one of the most coveted credits: cross-regional investment in U.S. industrial jumped 180% in H2 2024 (cbre.com). Syndicated and CMBS markets are relatively active again for large industrial loans, but private lenders often move faster, especially for niche deals (e.g. cold storage, fulfillment centers). We also see specialized “rent-to-own” financing and build-to-core loan products emerging in this space.
Office & Urban Repositioning: Traditional office lending remains scarce. Even well-located offices face high vacancy and low liquidity, so banks have mostly stopped making new loans. Private credit funds are approaching this sector carefully: rather than financing vanilla offices, they target creative reuse opportunities. The biggest trend: office-to-residential conversions in gateway cities. New York’s conversion of the former Pfizer headquarters into 1,600+ apartments recently closed with a $720 million private loan – the largest such conversion financing in NYC history (ir.marcusmillichap.com). Funds like Madison Realty Capital specialize in these complex credits (often senior or structured first liens) that banks won’t touch. Similarly, loans for mixed-use repositioning (e.g. adding residential or lab space to office buildings) are being funded by debt funds. The returns sought here are high (often 12–15%+), reflecting both the risks of construction and the scarcity of capital.
By contrast, core downtown offices can still get refinanced if they are pristine. Credit funds have stepped in for trophy office loan extensions or takeouts, often syndicating or selling pieces later. One example: Blackstone itself announced purchases of Manhattan office loans as part of its debt strategy, betting on a “nascent recovery” in high-quality offices (reuters.com). Overall, funds treat office credit as a selective value-add niche rather than a stable loan book.
Land/Development Lending: This is the most specialized segment. “Raw land” loans (pre-entitlement) are generally shunned by banks due to long hold times. However, certain private lenders are carving out capabilities here. For instance, some funds are financing approved but undeveloped land in fast-growing markets – particularly for build-to-rent housing or logistics parks. These loans demand deep sponsor relationships and significant loss-protection (e.g. high equity-down, personal guarantees). Early signs suggest rising underwriting activity: bond insurers and smaller credit funds have reported a handful of structured land loans in 2024. The return expectations are very high (often above 15%) to compensate for entitlement risk. No broad index covers land lending, but managers describe it as an emerging frontier within real asset credit.
The “Credit Alpha” Thesis for CRE Allocators
Global LPs are increasingly looking beyond plain-vanilla lending to specialized credit strategies in CRE. The so-called “credit alpha” thesis is that skilled managers, via structuring and selection, can generate excess returns above baseline interest rates. Sources of this alpha include:
Structural Protections: Strong covenants, priority liens, debt-service reserves and junior-pay-down waterfalls. Goldman Sachs notes that these loan features (and the ability to enforce them) are key sources of private credit alpha (am.gs.com). A manager who can negotiate rigorous terms will see lower default losses, capturing upside as projects perform.
Flexible Structuring: Many private debt deals include PIK coupons, equity kickers or warrants, step-up rates after default, or customizable amortization. These can boost yield if a deal succeeds. For instance, one lender might take an equity slice of future sales or a share of residual value, effectively pairing debt with an equity-like option. Credit funds tout this ability to engineer one-stop financing as an edge.
Distressed/Opp Credit: In a high-rate environment, seasoned sponsors and funds have significant dry powder (Brookfield notes ~$380bn in PE-RE dry powder) (brookfield.com). When a borrower defaults, these managers can convert debt to equity or provide rescue capital, again capturing asset appreciation. Writing down less principal or restructuring at a premium can distinguish an astute credit manager from a passive loan holderam.gs.com.
Market Timing and Niche Expertise: Credit funds often have proprietary origination channels and are patient capital sources. Some LPs believe the current vintage of lending is especially opportune (“late-cycle”), allowing them to lock in high spreads today that may tighten later. Funds targeting niche sectors (senior housing, data centers, DST financing, etc.) are also seeking “information advantages” in less efficient markets.
In short, global LPs – from endowments to insurance boards – are allocating to CRE private credit not just for yield, but for these alpha sources. Surveys find many large investors intend to increase private debt commitments in 2025, diversifying into specialty finance and opportunistic credit beyond standard senior loans (withintelligence.com). In CRE specifically, marquee private debt managers routinely pitch that their track record of loss mitigation through cycles is a “core” driver of value. This narrative is backed by data: some analyses show private loans have meaningfully outperformed equivalent public CMBS in recent years, largely by avoiding fire-sale discounts on mispriced collateral.
Conclusion and Next Steps
The overall picture is clear: as conventional lenders caution, alternative capital has converted that into capitalization. A new paradigm is taking hold in CRE finance, where heavily-funded debt specialists supply almost all incremental credit. For owners and investors, this means more options for financing but also new counterparties to negotiate with. Deal terms may be more stringent, but borrowers benefit from certainty and partnership. For allocators, private CRE debt offers a differentiated yield opportunity with structural downside buffers.
Key takeaways: Private credit is filling a void of hundreds of billions in U.S. CRE funding. Deal volume is rising but banks are sidelined, so debt funds (and CMBS) must backstop liquidity (kkr.com) (brookfield.com). These funds are using every tool – senior mortgages, mezzanine loans, preferred equity and rescue bridge financing – to meet diverse capital needs (dwightcapital.com) (blackstone.com). Liquidity for U.S. CRE now comes from a global investor base: family offices, insurers, sovereign funds and pension funds from Europe, the Middle East and Asia have significant dry powder aimed at these markets (reinsurancene.ws) (cbre.com). Across asset classes, multifamily and industrial remain strong, while office assets are being repositioned or repurposed under new credit structures (e.g. the $720M Pfizer conversion loan in NYC) (ir.marcusmillichap.com). The “credit alpha” thesis – achieving excess return via structure and selection – continues to attract allocators to top managers in this space (am.gs.com) (cms.investmentofficer.com).
For a deeper discussion on deploying private credit in your portfolio, Sterling Asset Group’s investment team is available for consultation. Our experts can analyze market conditions, connect clients with leading debt funds, and structure tailored credit solutions aligned with your risk/return objectives. Contact us today to explore customized strategies in private real estate credit.
Disclaimer: This material is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an offer, solicitation or recommendation for any investment product. Sterling Asset Group is a registered investment advisor. This communication reflects our views as of the date listed and may change without notice. Any information or opinions provided herein are believed to be accurate at the time of writing but are subject to verification. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Investing involves risk, including loss of principal. This document is not investment advice and should not be relied upon as a replacement for professional advice. Prospective investors should conduct their own due diligence and consult their own legal, tax and financial advisors before investing.