What Is the Capital Stack in Real Estate? Structuring Northwest Arkansas Projects with Layered Equity and Flexible Debt
In institutional real estate investing, the capital stack is more than a funding structure—it’s the blueprint for how control, returns, and risk are distributed. As developers and sponsors target fast-growing regions like Northwest Arkansas, a well-structured capital stack becomes the linchpin for deal execution and investor alignment.
This article breaks down the capital stack from an Arkansas-focused lens, with insights into structuring ground-up and value-add projects in markets such as Springdale, Fayetteville, and Bentonville.
1. Understanding the Capital Stack: Four Core Layers
The capital stack is typically composed of:
Senior Debt – First lien, lowest risk, lowest cost
Mezzanine Debt or Preferred Equity – Subordinate, higher yield, may have equity-like rights
Common Equity (Limited Partners) – Passive investors, entitled to returns after debt and pref
Sponsor Equity (General Partner) – Co-investment capital with promoted return upside
The ordering determines the priority of payment in both income distribution and liquidation scenarios.
2. Why Capital Structure Matters in Northwest Arkansas
The region is one of the fastest-growing corridors in the South, with demand driven by:
Corporate anchors like Walmart HQ in Bentonville
Major investments in infrastructure and logistics
A surge in young professionals, developers, and institutional attention
To capitalize on these trends, sponsors must present capital stacks that are both conservative enough to attract lenders, and attractive enough to offer LPs meaningful upside.
3. Example: Structuring a Springdale Multifamily Deal
Consider a $25M ground-up project near downtown Springdale:
$16.25M Senior Loan (65%) from a regional bank at 6.25%
$3.75M Preferred Equity (15%) offering 9% pref and 15% IRR
$5M Common Equity (20%), with a 70/30 split LP to GP
$1M Sponsor Co-Investment from the development group
This structure blends debt leverage with a tiered equity approach, offering institutional partners clarity, alignment, and a risk-adjusted return profile.
4. Institutional Expectations: Best Practices for Arkansas Capital Stacks
Alignment of Interests: LPs expect GPs to have meaningful skin in the game (usually 5–15% of total equity).
Clear Waterfall Structure: Define how profits are distributed—typically pref return → return of capital → promote.
Market Stress Testing: Underwrite sensitivity scenarios (interest rates, cap rates, rent growth) for Northwest Arkansas’ local dynamics.
Flexibility in Debt: Regional lenders may offer non-recourse, construction-to-perm options or bridge-to-agency executions.
5. Co-GP and JV Models in Arkansas
Emerging sponsors in Fayetteville or Rogers often partner with capitalized co-GPs who can:
Bring LP relationships or fund equity
Handle asset management or investor relations
Share fees and promote based on contribution
These models are increasingly common in high-growth but capital-constrained areas like Arkansas.
Conclusion: Structure Determines Outcome
In high-velocity markets like Northwest Arkansas, access to land and opportunity isn't enough. The way a deal is structured—from the senior debt to the sponsor promote—ultimately determines its success.
At Sterling Asset Group, we work with developers and LPs to optimize the capital stack—ensuring every layer of capital is aligned with the deal’s strategy, exit, and long-term vision.
Contact Sterling Asset Group
Looking to structure your Arkansas real estate deal with institutional discipline?
→ Contact Us to explore capital stack advisory or co-GP partnerships.
Disclaimer
This page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or an offer to sell or buy securities. Sterling Asset Group does not provide investment or financial advisory services to the general public. Real estate investments involve risk, and prospective clients or partners should consult their legal, financial, or tax advisors before making investment decisions. Past performance is not indicative of future results.